[FAWG] Brief Summary of UFE meeting

Linda Jenkins lindajenkins177 at yahoo.com
Fri Mar 8 23:00:04 EST 2013


Thanks for the reply.
Yeah, there has been no definition and the only way I know to limit UFE's liability is to create a non-profit corp that would be the FOB....
O well,
Linda




________________________________
 From: Steve Revilak <steve at srevilak.net>
To: Linda Jenkins <lindajenkins177 at yahoo.com> 
Cc: "fawg at lists.occupyboston.org" <fawg at lists.occupyboston.org> 
Sent: Friday, March 8, 2013 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: [FAWG] Brief Summary of UFE meeting
 
> Thank you to those who attended and thanks for these notes, Steve. Would you mind adding who writes/prepares whatever is posted?

Sure done.

> My recollection is that the Comprehensive draft agreement had similar language to the Grant model draft agreement on the matters of supervision/oversight by the sponsor, which was a lot of what I had revised in the working doc.

Unfortunately, I don't think any of us were familiar enough with your
edits to really speak to them.  Speaking for myself, I know that we
agrees (at GA) to go with the comprehensive model, but I read the
documents enough to have a sense of the differences between grant and
comprehensive.

Regarding Friends of Occupy Boston, I stuck the answer to your
question here  
  http://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/Talk:UFE_Fiscal_Sponsorship_Meeting_4_March_2013

(This is the `discussion' tab for the meeting notes).

> The other thing; did you set another meeting date or concrete next steps? It would be great to have that spelled out too.

We didn't set a date for our next meeting, but we have next steps.  I
noted them here:

  http://wiki.occupyboston.org/wiki/UFE_Fiscal_Sponsorship_Meeting_4_March_2013#Next_Steps

Steve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.mayfirst.org/pipermail/fawg/attachments/20130308/eddcdb7f/attachment.html>


More information about the FAWG mailing list