[Street] [Ob-media] The Meaning of Last Night and Next Steps

Alex Pearlman alex at occupyboston.org
Fri Dec 9 14:30:41 EST 2011


I'm totally with Anna here. I think Brian's email makes a lot of great  
points and was exceptionally eloquent. I also supported the principle  
of Anasstassia's block because I thought she was right, so this is  
difficult.

But I have to go with the opinion that we should stand our ground  
until they come in and take it, at which point we declare a victory of  
non-violent, tactical retreat, and find a place to Occupy that's  
indoors, until we can recamp in the Spring.

I also have to add that the only tents that were dismantled in  
anticipation of a raid, agreed on by the group, were the expensive  
tents: food, library, womens caucus, and the equipment therein and  
logistics...

Most of the other tents were taken down by individuals because they  
didn't want their stuff taken in case of a raid. And whether they came  
last night or give us the weekend, they're coming.

Rebuilding a livable camp to defend is a great idea, but rebuilding  
completely without looking past Dewey is silly. We must not enable  
apathy and drug use, which is what Dewey devolved into. Let's move on,  
and realize Occupy Boston is a lot more than tents in Dewey Sq,  
despite our strong emotional attachment to that physical space.

Quoting Nicole Sullivan <nicole_sullivan at live.com>:

> Anna- I totally understand where you are coming from. Dewey, in many  
> ways, was incredibly draining. Its more that I wish we kept the  
> physical symbol for last night and the upcoming ones. Dewey is not  
> sustainable not only because of drug addicts and violence, but   
> because they are going to forcefully evict us.
>
> If they allowed us to stay indefinitely, then I would most likely be  
> with you. However, given the circumstances- I think it is  
> extraordinarily important we hold our ground.
>
> Nicole
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anna Aizman <anna at occupyboston.org>
> Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 19:00:54
> To: <nicole_sullivan at live.com>
> Cc: <asnevitt at gmail.com>; <bdubkwob at gmail.com>;  
> <obexpansion at gmail.com>; <ob-logistics at lists.occupyboston.org>;  
> <infotent at occupyboston.org>;  
> <occupy-boston-socialist-discussion at googlegroups.com>;  
> <street at lists.occupyboston.org>; <occupyeric at gmail.com>;  
> <occupybostonda at gmail.com>; <ob-media at lists.occupyboston.org>;  
> <occupy-boston-people-of-color-working-group at googlegroups.com>;  
> <check_your_privilege_ob at googlegroups.com>;  
> <movementbuildingob at masslists.org>;  
> <ocupemos-el-barrio at googlegroups.com>; <obit at occupyboston.org>;  
> <facilitation at lists.occupyboston.org>
> Subject: Re: [Ob-media] The Meaning of Last Night and Next Steps
>
> Ironically many people who worked at Food, Logistics, Safety, and  
> Medical were the most adamant about de-camping, and hoping that if  
> we take time to strategize we could come back with a stronger, safer  
> camp. Dewey Square was and will remain unsustainable - dangerous for  
> women, houseless people, and recovering drug users. There are  
> several drug rings at camp, and many more tents where people could  
> stay and use hard drugs. We have been enabling people who'd been  
> trying to stay sober, and offering a space for violent individuals  
> who threatened, sexually harassed, and assaulted vulnerable homeless  
> people and female activists. We failed to figure out a way to kick  
> out the people who (though they are undoubtedly part of the 99%) did  
> not share our goals and, instead, widely abused our community. We've  
> been watching activists leave the tent city, and leave fewer and  
> fewer people to take care of the daily functioning of the camp.  
> We've been turning activists away from camp because we have no tent  
> space for them to stay in -- the tents were increasingly occupied by  
> people who had no interest in contributing even in the smallest way  
> (insulting us when we asked for help). As a result, the energies of  
> most on-site occupiers were divested from the movement, and towards  
> camp maintenance, conflict resolution, substance abuse counseling  
> (when none of us are trained in it).
>
> None of the people who stood for striking down tents were actually  
> interested in ending the movement or parting with the idea of a camp  
> site. Rather, we believe we need time to figure out how to have an  
> occupation that is sustainable, an occupation that allows the  
> activists who camp to be part of the larger movement as well as of  
> the daily running of the camp. Maybe this means involving  
> professional social workers or counselors on-site, or maybe it means  
> having a vetting system to ensure a truly substance- and  
> violence-free camp. I hope that we can keep in mind the difference  
> between what we'd like for camp to symbolize and what the camp  
> experience actually was -- especially for vulnerable people.
>
> There are a lot of meaningful relationships at camp but there is  
> also an incredible amount of negative energy that's another reason  
> for the exhaustion of so many OB activists. If we are defending  
> Dewey Square and re-building it, I hope that, in addition to the  
> faith of so many people in the tent city symbol, we take into  
> account the experiences of the people who found themselves  
> struggling to keep the camp from dissolving in violent conflicts or  
> getting raided by police for drug use, violence, or sexual assault.  
> I hope we do something different this time, because the Dewey Square  
> camp never looked as beautiful as it did last night, when people  
> demonstrated and danced in the streets. In reality, Dewey Square  
> version 1.0 was far from festive and communal.
>
> -Anna
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Nicole Sullivan  
> <nicole_sullivan at live.com <mailto:nicole_sullivan at live.com> > wrote:
>
>
>  Brian, I agree.
>
>
> While last night was a huge success in so many ways and I so proud  
> of that, we also decamped ourselves. My tent (the mike tent) is a  
> filth hole but it is still standing. Democracy isn't clean, it isn't  
> sanitary. Its a messy process that takes a lot of trial and error.  
> Our encampment is a symbol of our freedom. I do wish we did not  
> capitulate so early. 
>
>
> Thank you to all who are rebuilding today. I wish I could be there  
> with you, however I do need to get some life stuff done before  
> tonight.
>
>
> Nicole
>
>
> ----------------
> From: asnevitt at gmail.com <mailto:asnevitt at gmail.com>
>  Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 13:08:37 -0500
> Subject: Re: The Meaning of Last Night and Next Steps
> To: bdubkwob at gmail.com <mailto:bdubkwob at gmail.com>
> CC: ob-media at lists.occupyboston.org  
> <mailto:ob-media at lists.occupyboston.org> ;  
> facilitation at lists.occupyboston.org  
> <mailto:facilitation at lists.occupyboston.org> ; obexpansion at gmail.com  
> <mailto:obexpansion at gmail.com> ; ob-logistics at lists.occupyboston.org  
> <mailto:ob-logistics at lists.occupyboston.org> ;  
> check_your_privilege_ob at googlegroups.com  
> <mailto:check_your_privilege_ob at googlegroups.com> ;  
> occupy-boston-people-of-color-working-group at googlegroups.com  
> <mailto:occupy-boston-people-of-color-working-group at googlegroups.com> ;  
> InfoTent at occupyboston.org <mailto:InfoTent at occupyboston.org> ;  
> occupyeric at gmail.com <mailto:occupyeric at gmail.com> ;  
> movementbuildingob at masslists.org  
> <mailto:movementbuildingob at masslists.org> ;  
> ocupemos-el-barrio at googlegroups.com  
> <mailto:ocupemos-el-barrio at googlegroups.com> ;  
> street at lists.occupyboston.org <mailto:street at lists.occupyboston.org>  
> ; obit at occupyboston.org <mailto:obit at occupyboston.org> ;  
> occupy-boston-socialist-discussion at googlegroups.com  
> <mailto:occupy-boston-socialist-discussion at googlegroups.com> ;  
> occupybostonda at gmail.com <mailto:occupybostonda at gmail.com>
>
>
>
>
> Thank you for this, Brian.
>
> I'm sorry I cannot be there today to "rebuild". I have vast  
> appreciation for those of you with the stamina and the wisdom to do  
> that work this morning. I will be there as soon as I am able.
>
> I hope we can all remember that what we're standing up for - to  
> demand the end of profound corruption of democracy and the beginning  
> of true democracy for the first time in this nation's history - is  
> far more important than a pristine encampment which meets codes. As  
> adults, we can make a choice to take more risks than we would  
> normally take because we find it worthwhile. The city stops us from  
> having sanitation, lowering fire hazards, etc. and still we stay  
> because this is about something bigger: a just and sustainable  
> society for all.
>
> No one here complained that Egyptians didn't have permits or weren't  
> meeting safety codes when they occupied Tahrir Square. I bet their  
> tents got dirty, too! We encouraged them to stand up to bullets and  
> fire hoses and tear gas, even though there was trash on the ground.  
> They did the best they could to manage it while they were protesting  
> and we do, too.
>
> We, the 99%, have had enough of the oppression of the 1%. We will  
> stand until they forcibly remove us. Then we will stand again.
>
>  - Allison
>  Una at DailyKos <http://www.dailykos.com/user/UnaSpenser>   
> <http://bostonlyme.blogspot.com/>
>
>   <http://kossacksnetworking.ning.com>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 7:00 AM, Brian K <bdubkwob at gmail.com  
> <mailto:bdubkwob at gmail.com> > wrote:
>  Brothers and sisters,
>
>
> I just got home after spending over 2 hours cleaning and renovating  
> the occupation in Dewey Square AFTER all the events of the night, so  
> sorry if this email isn't totally clear....
>
>
> Last night was a major moment in the development of our movement. It  
> is ripe with tactical and strategic lessons, and we must understand  
> and act on them IMMEDIATELY. What follows is my assessment of what  
> we got right, what we got wrong, and what the next steps are.
>
>
> What we got right: 
>
>
> Sensing a major threat to our movement, we mobilized the masses to  
> defend us! We must have had a thousand people come and rally to  
> support of our movement. There were tons of people following the  
> marching band, tons more in a state of perma-rally by the north  
> wall, tons more practicing civil disobedience, and tons more just  
> milling around, talking, sharing ideas, and showing their solidarity  
> in many ways. 
> We ended up taking the streets and shutting down Atlalntic ave. We  
> had only 2 arrests (that I know of), and everything was peaceful,  
> jubliant, and energizing. People of all kinds, young, old, abled and  
> disabled, people of color, students, union and non-union workers,  
> and all segments of the 99% all came out for unity and solidarity  
> with Occupy Boston. Mobilizing our social base all-out like this was  
> the right thing to do and that is (in part) why it was so successful.
>
>
>
>
> What we got wrong: 
> As painful as this truth may be, we have to face it squarely and  
> honestly: we dismantled most of our own occupation without a fight.  
> In this sense we really punched ourselves in the face. Needlessly.
>
>
> By 4 am, Dewey Square had only about 30% of the tents it did 24  
> hours previously. There was trash and debris strewn on the sidewalks  
> and perimeter. And there were only about 30-40 people left from the  
> 1,000+ who had been there at some point earlier. In other words, we  
> weren't raided by the police, but by 3:30 am, it looked like we had  
> been. 
>
>
> This was demoralizing because it looked like a post-apocalyptic  
> occupy that I saw in Denver, after they had been raided twice. But  
> we did it to ourselves. The Mayor/City/BPD/RKG achieved much of  
> their desired outcome basically WITHOUT LIFTING A FINGER.
>
>
> This was a strategic mistake. Period. Things like this sometimes are  
> only clear after the fact: the Mayor said "jump" and we jumped as  
> high as we could. This contrary to the very essence of the movement  
> insofar we are occupying to STAND UP and OPPOSE the dictates of the  
> powerful, not tremble in fear before them...
>
>
> Next steps:
> Luckily, there were about 5-10 of us who were able to salvage the  
> situation a bit. We moved a bunch of tents on "weird street" that  
> had been left for destruction by the (non-existent) police raid, and  
> moved them into the main square to fill in some of the gaping (and  
> depressing) holes. Another 5-10 of us cleaned up the sidewalks,  
> swept, and restored some semblance of order to the outward  
> appearance. 
>
>
> But there is more work to be done. This means anyone who can needs  
> to return to the Square ASAP to help re-organize the space,  
> re-purpose the tents, re-allocate the pallets and walkway planks.  
> Not for permanent occupation, but for the next 24 to 48 hours of the  
> struggle. Yes, the cops can come Friday night (tonight) or Saturday  
> night or Sunday night. We should be ready for them to come on any  
> one of these nights, but we can sit on our hands and wait; we have  
> to keep struggling, keep assembling and keep speaking out against  
> injustice. 
>
>
> I'm not saying we need to bring back everything to the square. We  
> can do without the library books and other valuables in Dewey. But  
> we need to CONTINUE occupying until some decisive event that forces  
> us into another space. Otherwise they can effectively shut down our  
> occupation with merely the ever-present threat of shutting it down.  
> Let us not allow ourselves to be paralyzed with fear like that.
>
>
>
>
> Why we messed up: 
> Part of the problem is that strategically, many of us were thinking  
> in "post-Dewey" mode, yet we were not (and are not) yet there. We  
> are still in Dewey Square. And we must defend it.
>
>
> By dismantling our occupation, we essentially tried to shortcut the  
> difficult and painful midwife between where we are now and the birth  
> of our next phase: the police raid. This reminds me of a quote from  
> Hagakure, the book of the samurai from feudal-era Japan: 
>
>
> "There is something to be learned from a rainstorm. When meeting  
> with a sudden shower, you try not to get wet and run quickly along  
> the road. By doing such things as passing under the eaves of houses,  
> you still get wet. When you are resolved from the beginning, you  
> will not be perplexed, though you will still get the same soaking.  
> This understanding extends to all things."
>
>
> Pick up on that. By trying to avoid the police raid, we ended up  
> doing it to ourselves. This had the desired outcome of our enemies  
> (a massive dismantling in Dewey), but we got nothing to show for it.  
> Many of us may feel "perplexed," but need not be if we "are resolved  
> from the beginning" to stand our ground. 
>
>
> Just like the first raid on us, and so many other raids happening  
> around the country, raids are not pleasant, but they are a necessary  
> part of being an occupation that does NOT jump when the powers that  
> be tell us to. Otherwise we might as go home now. 
>
>
> Remember: when people see the violence of the police officers  
> arresting veterans, manhandling priests, hog-tying peaceful 99%ers,  
> this rightly causes OUTRAGE. And it is that outrage that can help  
> feed our movement for the next phase. We must not evict ourselves;  
> make them do it.
>
>
> As of now, we have a damaged (but not un-salvagable) occupation.  
> Please go to Dewey Square ASAP and see why. Especially Logistics and  
> Food. We need your insight, experience, and steady hands the MOST  
> during the day. Today.
>  
> As for everyone else, see you at tonight's GA...in Dewey Square.
>
>
> Revolutionary love and solidarity,
> and now sleep.
>
>
> Brian
>
>
> p.s. please forward this to any groups/lists/folks I left out.
>
> _______________________________________________
>  Ob-media mailing list
>
>  Post: Ob-media at lists.occupyboston.org  
> <mailto:Ob-media at lists.occupyboston.org>
>  List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/ob-media
>
>  To Unsubscribe
>         Send email to:  Ob-media-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org  
> <mailto:Ob-media-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org>
>         Or visit:  
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/ob-media/anna%40occupyboston.org
>
>  You are subscribed as: anna at occupyboston.org <mailto:anna at occupyboston.org>
> _______________________________________________
> Ob-media mailing list
>
> Post: Ob-media at lists.occupyboston.org
> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/ob-media
>
> To Unsubscribe
>         Send email to:  Ob-media-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org
>         Or visit:  
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/ob-media/alex%40occupyboston.org
>
> You are subscribed as: alex at occupyboston.org
>



-- 
Alex Pearlman
Occupy Boston Media Team



More information about the Street mailing list