[Consensus] [Spokes] [Facilitation] Another CG cancelation
Terra Friedrichs
terraf at compuserve.com
Tue Feb 14 12:47:36 EST 2012
I don't think they will be, because you said in your email: "if another
Spokescouncil does evolve for that night"
Did you mean if, in advance, it evolves into a council? If so, I
apologize. I was reading that as y'all would go to a site and then see
if a meeting evolves...which would be different than if it evolves ahead
of time and then is announced.
Sorry for the hair trigger.
T
On 2/14/2012 12:37 PM, Gregory Murphy wrote:
> Terra - I am unsure what triggered your email.
>
> In the current model we are trying out, Spokescouncil's have the same
> decision making authority as any WG . . . if something comes up at a
> SC meeting, which needs OB approval, the issue will be "bumped up" to GA
>
> and if SC's do get adopted at OB, of course agendas and topics will be
> announced ahead of time. Why did you think they may not be?
>
> Greg
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Terra Friedrichs
> <terraf at compuserve.com <mailto:terraf at compuserve.com>> wrote:
>
> Huh what? If Spokescouncil is going to be a "decision making
> body", then it has to be announced ahead of time, with an agenda.
> It's not fair for decision making bodies to "evolve for that
> night". That's so uncool. Untransparent. Unaccountable. All the
> stuff that oppressed populations cry out about.
>
>
> On 2/14/2012 12:26 PM, Gregory Murphy wrote:
>> if another Spokescouncil does evolve for that night, let's find
>> another location - CCB does not have the right shape or size room
>> . . .
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:21 PM, jackie <jackie at occupyboston.org
>> <mailto:jackie at occupyboston.org>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jorge (and FWG and Spokes WG),
>>
>> I think using that slot for a spokes council is a great idea.
>> The only issue is that we'd be having two spokes councils
>> back to back (Sunday and then Monday), and I wonder if that
>> would burn people out. Still, if enough people are up for it,
>> the longer time slot - plus the fact that our spokes WG
>> meeting is right afterwards - makes it seem like a great fit.
>>
>> This might be an unpopular suggestion - and I'm hesitant to
>> even say it - but another idea is to continue a conversation
>> about processing feelings about the community strife if (and
>> only if!) people are interested in that. It seemed like,
>> based on our conversation at spokes wg last night, some
>> people are craving something like this while other people are
>> uncomfortable returning to those discussions, which is why
>> they feel GA isn't the place for it. Again, just throwing it
>> out there as an idea (and please be kind even if you hate
>> that idea!). I do think, though, the spokes council idea is
>> preferable though and will be more productive and overall
>> positive. My twinkle fingers point more in that direction.
>>
>> Best,
>> Jackie
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Jorge Alvarez
>> <eghm627 at mac.com <mailto:eghm627 at mac.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Hola and ARGH!
>>
>> OB Radio has canceled their presentation at CG next
>> Monday. As I was at the CG, I couldn't voice my desire
>> to go on with it and those present at the meeting
>> consented to dropping out.
>>
>> It falls upon us (FWG) again -- does anyone friggin' care
>> about CG's?!
>>
>> Anyway, I think we can actually present some sort of talk
>> or round table -- or we can screen another film. Despite
>> the low attendance at last night's CG, those that
>> remained to watch Inside Job were engaged and enjoyed the
>> film.
>>
>> I think we should take next week's spot but announce at
>> GA's this week that the slot is open to any other WG that
>> wishes to take it.
>>
>> *Alternately, maybe we at Spokes would like to hold/model
>> another Spokes at the CG next Monday (Community Church)
>> and sorta' make up some time on the M17 action -- as we
>> didn't spend much time really developing a working plan
>> or action at the last 2 meetings. *
>> *
>> *
>> *Yes, short notice, but it would be on our WG meeting
>> night anyway, AND we could have a short WG
>> meeting/debrief afterward?*
>> *
>> *
>> *What do we think? Anyone else in Spokes up for this?*
>>
>> If not, FWG will take the CG.
>>
>> With peace,
>> Jorge Alvarez
>> eghm627 at mac.com <mailto:eghm627 at mac.com>
>>
>> This email was composed on a mobile device. Please
>> excuse any errors.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Facilitation mailing list
>>
>> Post: Facilitation at lists.occupyboston.org
>> <mailto:Facilitation at lists.occupyboston.org>
>> List info:
>> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/facilitation
>>
>> To Unsubscribe
>> Send email to:
>> Facilitation-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org
>> <mailto:Facilitation-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org>
>> Or visit:
>> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/facilitation/jackie%40occupyboston.org
>>
>> You are subscribed as: jackie at occupyboston.org
>> <mailto:jackie at occupyboston.org>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spokes mailing list
>>
>> Post: Spokes at lists.occupyboston.org
>> <mailto:Spokes at lists.occupyboston.org>
>> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/spokes
>>
>> To Unsubscribe
>> Send email to:
>> Spokes-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org
>> <mailto:Spokes-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org>
>> Or visit:
>> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/spokes/gsjmurphy%40gmail.com
>>
>> You are subscribed as: gsjmurphy at gmail.com
>> <mailto:gsjmurphy at gmail.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Consensus mailing list
>>
>> Post:Consensus at lists.occupyboston.org <mailto:Consensus at lists.occupyboston.org>
>> List info:https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/consensus
>>
>> To Unsubscribe
>> Send email to:Consensus-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org <mailto:Consensus-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org>
>> Or visit:https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/consensus/terraf%40compuserve.com
>>
>> You are subscribed as:terraf at compuserve.com <mailto:terraf at compuserve.com>
>
> --
> Terra
>
> *~*~*~*
> Terra Friedrichs
> 978 808 7173 <tel:978%20808%207173> (cell)
> 978 266 2775 <tel:978%20266%202775> (desk)
> 978 266 2778 <tel:978%20266%202778> (home/messages)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Consensus mailing list
>
> Post: Consensus at lists.occupyboston.org
> <mailto:Consensus at lists.occupyboston.org>
> List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/consensus
>
> To Unsubscribe
> Send email to: Consensus-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org
> <mailto:Consensus-unsubscribe at lists.occupyboston.org>
> Or visit:
> https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/options/consensus/gsjmurphy%40gmail.com
>
> You are subscribed as: gsjmurphy at gmail.com
> <mailto:gsjmurphy at gmail.com>
>
>
--
Terra
*~*~*~*
Terra Friedrichs
978 808 7173 (cell)
978 266 2775 (desk)
978 266 2778 (home/messages)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/private/consensus/attachments/20120214/3a6df1cf/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Consensus
mailing list